From: alex
Message: 26005
Date: 2003-09-24
> Which phenomenon? The data you have produced are irrelevant. YouAlbanian "ngul" see Romanian "incolo"
> still
>> haven't answered my objections against positing <n-> + *gWe- =
> <ngje->.
>>
>
>> Piotr
> ************
> Ok, lets take another PIE verb *kWol- > ngul `to drive in(to), to
> settle', <ngulim> `settlement, colony', <ngulitem> `to settle',
> <shpërngul> `to displace, to move', <përkul> `to bend, to flex' from
> o-grade form of *kWel-/*kWelH- `to revolve, move around, sojourn,
> dwell', besides *kWelH- <sjell> `to carry, to bring' (aorist
> <solla>), <sillem> `to turn', <sjellje> `behaviour, conduct'.
> So, I think that I have right that labiovelar /*kW-/, preceded by
> prefix n- cause it to be treated as pure velar.
>
> Konushevci