From: m_iacomi
Message: 25809
Date: 2003-09-14
>>>> So one should rephrase: "Dr. J.S., based on his generalFrom my point of view that's not enough for suspicion. Hypotheses
>>>> knowledge background, believes that duck was a symbol of the
>>>> universe, a conclusion not shared by others.".
>>>
>>> Note J.S. mentions duck with goose, Latin 'anser', German 'Gans'
>>
>>> *gHans-; note the unexpected initial, pointing to loan (and
>>> strengthening the suspicion of a pun).
>>
>> Why pun?
>
> Bad formulation. The presence of one more word beginning in an-, not
> the variation in the anlaut consonant, strengthens that suspicion.
>>>> Not too much for evidence of a link with soul...Still wrong. J.S. himself claims his interpretation (link "duck-
>>>
>>> Your conclusion about J.S.'s conclusion was hasty...
>>
>> Nope. You indicated a source to support your claim about linking
>> ducks with the notion of `soul` for some pre-historical moment. I
>> pointed out that your source doesn't offer too much support for
>> your claim.
>
> You were guessing J.S.'s made up the duck-soul link all by himself.
> That was hasty, given the other evidence easily found on the net.
> Yes, and the Andreas Hårde article is one of them. The title showsI'm sorry to seem so nasty, but I fail to see any "soul" word in
> it contains some type of discussion of the duck-soul link.
>>> Andreas Hårde, 1998Aaaah, so you didn't read it, but it just happens you know the
>>> Andlighet eller anklighet i Hallstatt?
>>> Spiritualism or just ducks in the Hallstatt culture?
>>> A critical study of the understanding of the iconography
>>> from a structural point of view with reference to the
>>> mythopoeia and interpretation of myth structures
>>> associated with bird depictions from Central Europe
>>> during the Urnenfelder period and the Hallstatt period
>>
>> The same: list of references. I haven't read his article and
>> you didn't provided at least a significent extract, along with
>> his bibliography.
>
> I haven't read it either. I just happened to know that the theory
> existed. If you you want to satify your curiosity, read the article.
>> ... but doesn't tell what was actually the supposed culticWell, actually no. It is not me the one very interrested in
>> meaning.
>
> So now you have one more reason for ordering Hårde's article.
>>> It took me 30 minutes to find these references on google. I wishAs said, Halstatt ducks are not exactly the subject of most books
>>> you guys would do your homework better.
>>
>> This was not my research homework and
>
> The one you didn't do?
>> OTOH your initial message was claiming that J.S. provides supportThx a lot.
>> for your duck <-> soul link, not that ducks could have had some
>> cultic meaning according to various authors. Well, you still have
>> to argue that link.
>
> Yeah, right. Happy reading.