Actually, I ment this topic seriously.
First of all: Personally I do not find massive penises attractive.
Nor do I consider huge silicone-filled tits on women to be of any
attraction. My topic has nothing to do with what kind of sexual
things I like or not.
I am perhaps repeating myself with other words, but I try to explain
once again:
1. I have gererally observed that any population have the habit of
bragging about being bigger, stronger, mightier in every means than
other populations, and about calling oneself something indicating
that they are big and strong in some aspect.
2. In many indoeuropean populations, big strong gigantic phaloses
seem to have been an object of cult and admiration (an admiration I
personally do not share).
3. In ancient time talking about ones sexual parts do not seem to be
connected with so much taboo as it is nowadays, on the contrary
those things seem to be something one was bragging about publicly.
Taken these three facts together, I think there is a posibility that
the old Indoeuropeans called themselves something like what I
proposed.
--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:
>
> Aquila touches on a hard topic:
> >What i am thinking is this: In many populations having a big or
> >long penis is something very attractive.
>
> You should check out the population that frequents the local
> gay bar I work at.
>
> Frankly, Aquila, I'm blown away by your meaty proposal but while
> this topic arouses me into the sin of stroking my fertile
imagination
> to publicly ejaculate endless double entendre, don't you think that
> maybe you should be keeping this idea tucked safely in your pants
> for that special someone off the List who will take it more
seriously?
>
> PS: Email me some pics too >:)
>
>
> = gLeN
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963