Re: [tied] family

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi <m_iacomi@...>"
<m_iacomi@...> wrote:

> In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex_lycos" <altamix@...> wrote:
>
> >> Besides that, the Aromanian word /f&meal'e/ is by all means
> >> decisive in arguing one should look for an "l", not an "n"
> I don't get your point. There is no /fumeye/ in Daco-Romanian,
> one can find /f&me(a)ye/ or /fime(a)(y)e/ as subdialectal forms.

I suppose that justifies Miguel's *fãmeie (except for the
asterisk!). Is there any sign of any of /f1me(a)(y)e/ ?

Richard.