Re: [tied] Germanic nominal declensions: n-stems

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:59:12 +0200, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> Goth. ON OE OS OHG
>N *-z baúrg-s mOrk[*] burg burg burg
>A *-uN baúrg [1] mOrk burg burg burg
>n *-0 (-0)
>G *-iz (*-az) baúrg-s merk-r [5] byrg burges [6] burg
>D *-i(:) baúrg mOrk byrg burg burg
>
>N *-iz baúrg-s merk-r byrg burg-i [7] burg
>A *-uNz baúrg-s [2] merk-r byrg burg-i burg
>n *-a (-0)
>G *-o:N (*-aN) baúrg-e: [3] mark-a byrg-a burg-o burg-o
>D *-(u)miz baúrg-im [4] mOrk-om burg-um burg-un burg-um
>
>[1] for expected baúrg-u, analogical after e.g. o-stem -s/-0.
>[2] the acc.pl. has merged with the Npl. everywhere.
>[3] with Gothic Gpl. -e: instead of -o:
>[4] -im for -um after the i-stems?
>[5] ON/OE Umlaut shows that PGmc was *-iz not *-az.
>[6] Gsg. -es after the o-stems.
>[7] NApl. -i after i-stems.

[*] ON Nsg. -0 < Asg. -0 for expected *-r.


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...