Re: [tied] Establishing a year for Mahabharata war: 3067 BCE

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@...>
wrote:

> The astronomical evidence is there. It is remarkable that a date
> can so consistenly explain almost about 100 varied astronomical
> observations in the text. There is every reason to believe that
> these were 'observed' celestial epigraphs.

Dr. Kalyanaraman,

Could you enumerate what those reasons are? Obviously, for this
finding to carry any great weight it will be necessary at least to
show that the passages in the epic's text are actually unambiguous
references to the specified celestial events.

Regards,
Ned Smith