From: george knysh
Message: 23535
Date: 2003-06-19
> george knysh wrote:*****GK: I had heard differently. There is also a
> .
> >
> > GK: It's also important to decide whether
> some
> > areas are preferable to others as the primary
> locale
> > for proto-Romanian settlements. I would attach
> more
> > importance (for starters) to those parts of
> > mountainous Old Serbia which are full of Romanian
> > toponyms. This would make us focus at first on
> Moesia
> > Superior (incl. the later Dacias esp.
> > Mediterranea)rather than Scythia Minor.
>
>
> In so far I am informed, the linguists see the
> toponyms of Old Serbia as
> being "recent". With "recent" they mean here after X
> century AC.
>__________________________________
> alex
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>