Re: [tied] Re: RO eccles. term.

george knysh wrote:
.

>
> *****GK: It's also important to decide whether some
> areas are preferable to others as the primary locale
> for proto-Romanian settlements. I would attach more
> importance (for starters) to those parts of
> mountainous Old Serbia which are full of Romanian
> toponyms. This would make us focus at first on Moesia
> Superior (incl. the later Dacias esp.
> Mediterranea)rather than Scythia Minor.******

In so far I am informed, the linguists see the toponyms of Old Serbia as
being "recent". With "recent" they mean here after X century AC.

alex