tolgs001 wrote:
> For otherwise, if K's map had been a copy of such
> an old map, this would have been put (along with
> photos) in history books for pupils in Romanian
> schools at least between 1850-2003.
>
> So don't expect to make some... epochale Entdeckung,
> à la admiral Piri Reis's map of the Antarctica. :)
>
> George
this is interesting that you already making suppositions even if you has
no idea what can be about( I don't have it too). I just wait to see and
to read. It shouldn't be the only one who speaks about "walaches oder
rumuny". If we count on Oguznamen and of the chronic of Friedrich
Barbarossa ( this one , right some later, 1189 AC) then the things
appear in another light. About this Atlas appeared first time in
Romanian in 1984 a comentar about this appeared in 1984 under the
signature of Ana Maria Coman in "Analele de istrorie", nr 1/1984 and
2/1984
More interesting , in my opinon is that the work of Klaproth is qoted by
.... Roesler in his "Rumänische Studien". In the critic to the theory of
Roesler, I never found any comentar about which refers to the statments
of J.H. Klaproth.
OK, when we will have the material, we can discusse about it and it
should be welcome to present this material on r-hist too I hope.
alex