Re: [tied] SMOK^WR (ex Re: Nominative: A hybrid view)

----- Original Message -----
From: João Simões Lopes Filho
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] SMOK^WR (ex Re: Nominative: A hybrid view)


> But *k^wr can be treated as kWr instead of *k^ur ? Or some kind of
metathesis took place *k^wr- > *k^ru ?

The latter, like *kW(e)tru- ~ *kW(e)twr.-

I also think the relation between *swek^ur-o- and *swek^ru-h2 (<
**swek^wr.-h2) is of the same kind.

Piotr