Re: [tied] Re: ANUS

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
>
>> How open minded from you. Evidence for "slavic" is in
> Serbo-Croatian:-)) This is exactly the linguistic fingerprint which is
> called "slavic school". I will be very cautios to note something for
> Slavic which is to find just in Balcan. You will have an "-ml-" from
> "-mj-" you said? From which "-mj-" in this case?
>
> Alex, caution is something that I would generally recommend to you.
> Given your lack of relevant knowledge, you are amazingly free with
> your words and opinions. I am again thinking of changing your status
> to "moderated", as, despite earlier warnings, you're cluttering the
> list with irrelevant postings again.

You will do it in a shortly time, I am sure. Specialy if I have too free
opinions regarding the Slavic influence:-)))
If this is irrelevant even if there are implied languages as latin,
slavic, greek, albanian, romanian, then OK. Maybe you will have a
suggestion too where I can discusse about these languages, I will be
thankfully to you.

>
> -j-an-inU (pl. stem -ja-n-) is a very common Slavic suffix forming
> ethnic names and terms meaning inhabitants of a given place (e.g.
> *gord-jan-inU 'inhabitant of a town, citizen').
>
> Piotr

I have nothing against the -ja-n there is the counterparts in
Latin -annus and in rom -ean-, thus they are related.
You showed in the post for George that Bj > Bl ( where B= labial).For me
is clear that "râmlean" cannot be Romanian since "mlea-" sounds very
strange for Romanian. The point here is an another. why "rym-"? In the
OCS texts I have, there is indeed in OCS an "y" , and for Rome there is
"rym-".( I cannot give the slavic special caraters here for the "weak
sign"
So how is to see the o > i in Slavic?.
Does not sound more probably that there has been an *rem which became an
"rim-" in Slavic?

Alex