Re: [tied] kentum and satem

I formulated my question not enough clear, sorry.
I wondered what classifications we get if we take the criterion of
palatalisation in one case (classification a) or the criterion of
k-collapsing in another case (classification b)?
Will both classification coincide?
Or we get something like
- Illyrian --- kentum (a) satem (b)
- Phrygian ---- satem (a) kentum (b)
- Armenian --- satem (a) satem (b)
etc.? (Just for example)

Alexander

----- Original Message -----
From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] kentum and satem


>
> > How should be classified in terms "kentum/satem" the following languages
>
> - Illyrian ---- (probably) centum
> - Phrygian ---- centum
> - Armenian ---- satem
> - Macedonian -- centum
> - Albanian ---- satem
> - Thracian ---- satem
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>