From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 22115
Date: 2003-05-21
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, João Simões Lopes FilhoIndic
> <josimo70@...> wrote:
> > Does the preservation of word *Re:g^-s in Celtic, Italic and
> demonstrate any particular social meaning or it's just aleatory?May
> represent a conservation of IE king in these people? There wasand
> another languages preserving *re:g^-s ? I know there is possibly
> Thracian Rhe:sos (<*Re:z-os).
> >
> The standard background remark on that observation is that Celtic
> Indic are at opposite ends of the geographical range of IE. Butbranches
> according to Karl Horst Schmitt (forgot the title of the article)
> Celtic shows sign of having been in contact with the Eastern
> of IE at an early stage. The nearest point of contact (betweenCeltic
> and Indic) would have been north of the Black Sea. And not wantingto
> upset people I abstain here from making any reference toconstruct"
> Cimmerians/Cimbri/Cymru.
>
> But perhaps we should look beyond IE.
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/rant/tgpedersen/Hrg.html
>
> I haven't yet added the Finnish and Hungarian r-k- "build,
> roots.************
>
>
> Torsten