Re: [tied] Re: the bee

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:15:49 +0200, alex_lycos <altamix@...>
wrote:

>And what do you do with "voinic", "voinicie", "voinicime" ?

voinic is a completly differnt word with a completely different Slavic
etymology.

>In the same manner if the "voie" was loaned from Slavic "volja" then
>what to do with:
>voios, voioSie, anevoios, învoioSa?

What's the problem?

>I guess it is seen as slavic "volja " < voia - seen as with article and
>from this "voia" was reconstructed an unarticulated form "voie".

In Romanian, -ia > -ie.

>This
>should be the one posibility. But there is the verb " a voi" = to want
>which is used by making the future too. There is not the " a vrea" but "
>a voi".voi, vei, va, vom, veti, vor.
>Is this too see as being all of the same Slavic "volja"? do not forget
>that is the grammar structure and it is said the only one influence from
>Slavic in grammar should be maybe the vocative in /o/. The future with
>" a voi" should be from what then?

Latin of course!


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...