From: alex_lycos
Message: 21160
Date: 2003-04-21
> ----- Original Message -----Not always. For instance if rom. "potârniche" is a derived of Latin
> From: "alex_lycos" <altamix@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 4:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] the bee
>
>
>> Moment. Shouldn't latin "ct" gave an "ft" in Albanian? We have seen
>> the explanaion where Latin "lucta" gave Albanian "lufta" ?
>
> A good point, but there's a subtle difference between Romanian and
> Albanian in this respect. Romanian has /pt/ and /ps/ from VLat. /kt/
> and /ks/ no matter what precedes; Albanian, on the other hand, has
> /ft/ and /fsh/ after back vowels only; elsewhere the /k/ was
> palatalised, eventually yielding modern /j/, hence *drEkt- > Rom.
> dreapta but Alb. drejtë
>You are right when you say let be serious. We cannot speculate on a name
>> Why are you so sure this is Latin "saggita"? Do we know what meant
>> the
> Dacian capital "sarmi-segetusa"? We see there the "-segetusa" and
> this can/could be the counterpart of Latin "saggita" as the Dacian
> "genucla" is the counterpart of Latin "genuculum"
>
> Let's be serious. You haven't got a shred of evidence as regards the
> meaning of Zarmi-(~ Zermi-)zegetusa
> What's wrong with the possibility that there were (at least) twoThere is nothing wrong. It is just a posiblity. As well as the "bletë"
> different words for 'bee', one a descriptive Latin term (alvi:na >
> *albinam 'hive-dweller'), the other a cultural loan from Greek
> (melitta --> *melettam)? Such doublets for domesticated animals are
> rather common. The terms need not have been completely synonymous in
> Balkan Latin, though the precise difference between the original
> meanings may have been too subtle to be reconstructible
>
> Piotr