Re: [tied] Re: bake

From: P&G
Message: 21066
Date: 2003-04-17

> >Piotr:
> >It seems to have been an *o-present, cf. Gk. pHo:go:.
> gLeN
> Cool. I like *o-presents. I wish I knew which IE verbs were
> *o-presents though. What are the others?

Some people are not as friendly to them as Glen, and deny their existence.
Rix analyses this root as *bHeh3g. He doesn't have any o-presents. I tend
to agree with him. Is there any evidence for an o-present, in any root, as
opposed to eh3?