Re: [tied] Re: to buy-revised

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 20433
Date: 2003-03-28

----- Original Message -----
From: "Abdullah Konushevci" <akonushevci@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: to buy-revised


> According to Petar Skok (ERHSJ, p. 236) Slavi kupiti "to buy" couldn't be derived from Gothic *kaupjan or Latin "caupo", cause diphtong au, as we see it in Latin loan reflects Slavic -av or -ov ...

In case there's any lingering doubt as to whether Gmc. *au may be reflected as Slavic *u, compare the following:

lukU 'onion' <-- Gmc. *lauka- (cf. Eng. leek, ON laukr, Ger. Lauch);

nuto 'livestock' <-- Gmc. *nauta- (cf. OE ne:at, ni:eten, ON naut, OHG no:z);

lugU/luga 'lye' <-- Gmc. *laugo: (cf. OE lye, ON laug, Ger. Lauge).

Piotr