From: george knysh
Message: 20362
Date: 2003-03-26
> > GK: /.../it seems useless to continue*****GK: Archaeology has proved most conclusively that
> > discussing this issue with you, Torsten. You have,
> > unfortunately, what seems to be some sort of
> religious
> > obsession with Snorri's account(s). Or, in modern
> > parlance, an ideological obsession. You will never
> > accept anything as constituting disproof of your
> idee
> > fixe. You will come back to it again and again,
> with
> > the same arguments. Take your last point. If I say
> (as
> > I have already many times) that there is no
> evidence
> > to indicate that migrants from the Bosporan
> Kingdom
> > (or Asaland or whatever) settled in Bastarnia, or
> > Thuringia or wherever in the time frame you have
> > selected, you will respond that they left no
> traces,
> > or that they changed culture, or anything at all
> it
> > seems.
> (T)Excuse me? I said it's difficult to prove someone
> emigrated from a
> place. The you go on about places people might have
> immigrated to.
>*****GK: Don't be silly. Your questions have been
> >Once a hypothesis has been shown to have no
> > viable scientific basis, it should properly be
> > dismissed. Your unwillingness to do so betrays
> > unscientific motivations.
>
> I asked you a question. I you don't want to answer
> it, fine.
>(T)As for ideological obsession with Snorri: I'm
> Danish, this is*****GK: The same attitude as Ukrainian (and other
> supposedly part of the history of my country, so
> what do you expect?
> (T)And if this is ideological, how would you then******GK: When there is no evidence to back up a
> characterize your own
> refusal to even consider it?
> > >*****GK: The fact that Snorri opted for one version
>
> > > >There is in any case a major contradiction in
> > > > the accounts of the Snorra Edda and of the
> > > > Heimskringla [Odin from a "misunderstood"
> Bosporus
> > > vs.
> > > > Odin from "Asaland"] which is reminiscent, in
> a
> > > way,
> > > > of other contradictions in Snorri's
> genealogies.
> >
> > >(T) True, but Ynglingatal claims he had
> possessions
> > both
> > > places.
> >
> > GK: There is no historical record of anyone
> > having large possessions in both Asia Minor and
> > "Asaland" in 50 BC. So the claim is spurious. We
> might
> > surmise that this is Snorri's attempt to reconcile
> two
> > incompatible versions: the Troy Legend and the
> Asaland
> > hypothesis. Having opted for the latter, he keeps
> the
> > former in the mention of Odin's "possessions" in
> > Tyrkland.
> > >
> (T)Exactly. I agree.
>*****GK: I'm not sure anyone agrees with your reading
> > > >These
> > > > contradictions don't really matter in the
> context
> > > of
> > > > real history. And you can't legitimately
> combine
> > > > elements of the two, esp. as to directions.
> > > (T)Yes, but I was wondering about Trittenheim's
> > > sources.
> >
> > GK: You have yet to refute the contention
> that
> > 'Hunibald' was a forgery.*****
>(T) This is what I know of the 'Hunibald' affair. The
> emperor demanded to
> see Trithemius' sources. Trithemius claimed they had
> been destroyed
> in a fire. After that everyone assumed Trithemius
> lied. But does this
> constitute proof that Trithemius used _no_ genuine
> sources? If that
> were the case, where does his 'Wechtam' come from?
>=== message truncated ===
> > >
> > > >The story
> > > > of "Odin" simply makes no sense whatever the
> > > source.
> > > > There are too many discoordinated variables.
> > > Including
> > > > the existence of yet a third Bosporus (or
> > > > "Ellipaltar") in classic Norse times: the
> > > connection
> > > > between the Baltic Sea and Lake Ladoga via the
> > > Neva to
> > > > the important Norse colonies of Old Ladoga and
> > > > Holmgardr.
> > >
> > > Please enlighten me on "Ellipaltar", that
> > > discoordinated variable.
> >
> > GK: You can start with the mention in
> > Heimskringla. It is also Saxo's "Hellespont".
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >(T) But as regards the "north, then west"
> > > > direction,
> > > > > cf
> > > > > > > this abstract
> > > > > > > from "Hunibald":/etc../
> > > > > > GK: What do these incredible stupidities
> > > > > have to
> > > > > > do with historical science?
> > > > > >
> > > > >(T) The issue was where the "north, then
> west"
> > > came
> > > > from
> > > > > in Snorri. He
> > > > > and Trittenheim might have used similar
> sources.
> > > >
> > > > GK: The numbers of "Hunibald" are very
> > > > reminiscent of the approach of Exodus.
> > > (T)True, which are ascribed to later redactors,
> thus
> > > logically secondary.
> >
> > GK: You have yet to demonstrate that there
> were
> > other than "secondary redactors" so to speak
> > (:=))))
> > >
> Torsten
>
>
>