From: george knysh
Message: 19734
Date: 2003-03-12
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel J. Milton"*****GK: I have a much simpler reason for not
> <dmilt1896@...>
> wrote:
> > The one seriously proposed shoreline change
> that might have had
> > a significant effect on Indo-European origins is
> the one proposed
> in
> > Pitman et al.'s "Noah's Flood" book, where the
> Mediterranean broke
> > through the straits and flooded a supposed
> sub-sealevel freshwater
> > predecessor of the Black Sea (I believe someone
> brought this up on
> > Cybalist a while ago). However, there was a paper
> by a Turkish
> > group in the journal Geology last year (I can
> check the ref. if
> > anyone wants it) that demolished the theory.
> Essentially, they
> > demonstrated (to my satisfaction at least) that
> through the time
> > when Pitman would have a mighty cataract pouring
> northward,
> > sediments in the Sea of Marmara were quietly
> prograding southward.
>
> That's strange, since that's the Old Greek version
> too (by I forgot
> whom). How about this scenario:
>
> 1) The Black Sea is a melt water lake with a level
> above that of the
> oceans, in the vicinity of several inland glaciers,
> connected to the
> Oceans by a river flowing south and west in what is
> now the Bosporus
> and Dardanelles.
>
> 2) Catastrophic collapse of glaciers overfills Black
> Sea, causing it
> to spill huge volumes of water though the river to
> the Ocean.
>
> 3) This erodes the bottom of the river to below sea
> level.
>
> 4) After the catastrophic outflow, sea water passes
> though the
> expanded channel (= present Bosporus, Dardanelles).
>
> Viola!
>
> Torsten
>__________________________________________________
>
>