From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 19255
Date: 2003-02-25
>Miguel:(Peter Ladefoged, actually)
>>Most people have very little voicing going on while the lips areI'm just saying that it's silly to talk about initial or final English
>>closed during either "pie" or "buy." Both stop consonants are
>>essentially voiceless.
>
>Let's see... "VERY LITTLE voicing"... "ESSENTIALLY voiceless".
>Miguel can't seem to distinguish totality from partiality. That
>is a fatal logical error if I've ever seen one.
>>The major difference between the words in the first two columnsThat merely shows that Latin terminology is still not dead.
>>is not that one has voiceless stops and the other voiced stops.
>>It is that the first column has (voiceless) aspirated stops and
>>the second column has (partially voiced) unaspirated stops.
>
>Yes, yes, but I fail to see how this above fact translates into
>"The major difference between English 'voiced' and 'voiceless'
>stops is aspiration". For the very fact that English stops
>are described according to voiced and voiceless shows that you
>can't be right.
>Plus, you're only speaking about the specific circumstance ofI should have scanned the whole of page 50 from Ladefoged's course in
>initial position in some specific dialect, not as a whole. And
>it's funny but even though "spank" has unaspirated voiceless
>[p], English speakers still register it as a _voiceless_ /p/.
>Funny eh?
>I guess what I'm trying to say is: Throw your lovely aspiration...what the phoneticists say. No.
>theory out the window. Voicing is the major contrast behind
>"t" and "d" in English, regardless of...