Re: [tied] isoglosses and substrate

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi <m_iacomi@...>"
<m_iacomi@...> wrote:

> There is no _dialectal_ boundary on Olt. Daco-Romanian spoken in
> Romania has several subdialects (Wallachian, Moldavian, from Banat
> area, CriSana-like, and from MaramureS). In the southern part, the
> spoken subdialect is Wallachian, on both sides of Olt river. At
> some sub-subdialectal level, Wallachian spoken on the western side
> of Olt has some minor specific features with respect to Wallachian
> from Bucharest, but essentially nothing related to phonetics.

Thank you. That sorts it out then for Romanian.

In Bulgarian, the jat boundary roughly coincides with lexical and
morphological isoglosses as well.

Regards,
Vassil K.

> Regards,
> Marius Iacomi