Re: [tied] isoglosses and substrate

v.karloukovski@... wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex_lycos" <altamix@...> wrote:
>
>> I don't have the work of Georgiev on the table (unfortunatelly).
>> From the bulgarian scholars I have the work of Decev and Duridanov
>> here on my table. Regarding the east and west relation, it seems
>> the relation is not very exactly
>
>
> OK. What about the modern Romanian. What is the nature of this (if
> any) dialectal boundary at Olt?
>
> Regards,
> Vassil

It seems I said a lot of wrong things here on this list about Rom. Lang.
Maybe is more better to let scholars as Miguel and Piotr to tell you
what about the nature of the dialect boundary. Or if they do not make a
such try, there are romanians on this list more qualified as me for
saying what about. I guess Mr Iacomi or Mr George will be so kind to
give you an qualified answer.

Regards

Alex