Re: Fw: [tied] Latin versus *Proto-Romance

S.Tarasovas@... wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex_lycos" <altamix@...> wrote:
>
>> mmm.. I guess I mean not *podU but podU an attested word . And
> the "u"
>> here should be the short "u" I guess since in my Dictionary is
> given as
>> an /u/ with the shortness sign on it
>
> I'm sure the word is attested, I even vaguely recall to have heard it
> once or two from my grandma (she referred to the 'hearth-stone' at
> the _bottom_ of a stove). I just quoted a generalizing Proto-Slavic
> etymon, hence an asterisk. According to your dictionary, in what
> language is it attested with the specific meaning 'bridge', by the
> way? Serbo-Croatian?
>
> Sergei

there is no information about. In my dictionary is just "sl."= abbrev.
for "Slavic"
If I take a look in my ILR-s ( History of Roumanian Language, several
authors) maybe I can find something more.
For instance Rosetti gives here the Bulgarian "podU" as being the Slavic
word where from Rom. "pod" should derive.