Re: [tied] George, be good.

From: george knysh
Message: 12862
Date: 2002-03-26

--- x99lynx@... wrote:
> George Knysh wrote:
> "General Note: For those who are confused by Steve
> Long's hop skip and jump method of argumentation,
> viz., completely ignoring certain points.., raising
> new issues in mid-stream, red herrings, etc., please
> be advised that this is nothing new. Have a look at
> message 280 on the European Archaeology list
> (November
> 29 2000). Let's hope we're not in for more of the
> same
> here..."
>
> (SL)George, George, George. /etc. etc. etc. etc.

******GK: My mistake. Looks like we're in for more of
the same...But at least Piotr will not censure your
responses to the "waxings" you received and doubtless
will continue to receive here, unlike Paul Barford's
pal Mark Hall on EuroArch, who refused to post my
response to message 1293. I nevertheless agree with
Barford's estimate of your methods, even though he
couldn't stand having his own "stature" impugned when
I mildly pointed out to him that Tacitus wrote not of
the "Aestii" but of the "Aestiorum gentes". Henry
Kissinger once asked "why are academic disputes so
vicious?" Answer: "Because the stakes are so small".
Amen.******


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards�
http://movies.yahoo.com/