From: george knysh
Message: 12419
Date: 2002-02-21
> --- In cybalist@..., george knysh <gknysh@...>******GK: Comments like that merely demonstrate for
> wrote:
> >
> > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> > But we have
> > > the testimony of
> > > Jordanes about the Eruli being driven from
> > > Scandinavia.
> >
> > *****GK: This is one of those obscure and
> ambiguous
> > passages in Jordanes from which no firm
> conclusions
> > can be drawn. He simply says that the Danes
> "Heruleos
> > propriis sedibus expulerunt". But he doesn't say
> > exactly when, and he doesn't say "expelled from
> > Scandinavia" (i.e. they could have moved to
> another
> > location in Scandinavia). This could in fact apply
> to
> > those Eruli who had recently settled in
> Scandinavia
> > after their trek north (cf. Procopius: the time
> frame
> > is shortly after 512 AD. The Danes are unknown
> prior
> > to the 6th century.) There has been extensive
> > discussion of this issue on the Gothic and
> Germanic
> > lists.******
> >
> >
> It is of course possible that the incident took
> place on Madagascar
> to where both peoples had emigrated, and from where,
> after the Danes
> had expule'd the Herulei they went their separate
> ways.
> Occam, and with no evidence that the Dani migrated__________________________________________________
> anywhere after
> this event, the safest bet is to assume that it
> happened where the
> Dani live now, ie. in Denmark.
>
> The problem is with the interpretation of <proprius>
> "own".
> Whose "own"? Did the Danes expel the Heruli from the
> Heruli's own
> settlements (thus being invaders or colonizers from
> somewhere else,
> eg. Sweden) or did the Danes (as I read in a
> fanciful book by Viggo
> Starcke) expel the Heruli from the Danes' own
> settlements (the
> Heruli, thus, should be assumed to have improperly
> taken those from
> the Danes some time before)?
>
> There is a third solution to the "own" problem.
> Suppose both peoples
> lived in the same settlements and that the Danes
> drove them out for
> some reason? The Heruli are known to have been both
> a class (when in
> Denmark) and a people (when in Europe). The
> spectacle of a people
> driving out a learned class or people would not be a
> unique one in
> history.
>
> I propose this scenario:
>
> 1) approx 50 BCE - 0
>
> Someone arrives from the south in Denmark and later
> in the rest of
> Scandinavia (Albrectsen's conclusion based on the
> sudden introduction
> of inhumation graves, see earlier postings).
>
> 2) approx 190 CE
> The last "free Scandinavians" in western Norway
> launch an attack on
> the invaders but are repulsed (Illerup Aadal, approx
> 15000 weapon-
> related items sacrificed in bog (see
> http://www.illerup.dk) and
> related sites, this is no incursion, this is war)
>
> 3) approx 400 CE?
> As the Roman empire is weakened, so are the Germanic
> tribes that prey
> on them. A new attack, and the original invaders
> (now known as
> Heruli) are expelled. In the general mayhem under
> the occupation, all
> tribes known before to Greek and Roman authors
> (except possibly the
> Cimbri) have disappeared and the people is now known
> under the name
> of another tribe of the original invaders: Dani.
>
> 4) approx 50-100 years later?
> The Heruli return from Europe and are given free
> passage through
> Denmark to Sweden, where they settle.
>
> Dates subject to negotiation, of course!
>
> Torsten
>
>
>