[tied] Re: A "Germanic" query

From: tgpedersen
Message: 12428
Date: 2002-02-22

--- In cybalist@..., george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> > --- In cybalist@..., george knysh <gknysh@...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> > > But we have
> > > > the testimony of
> > > > Jordanes about the Eruli being driven from
> > > > Scandinavia.
> > >
> > > *****GK: This is one of those obscure and
> > ambiguous
> > > passages in Jordanes from which no firm
> > conclusions
> > > can be drawn. He simply says that the Danes
> > "Heruleos
> > > propriis sedibus expulerunt". But he doesn't say
> > > exactly when, and he doesn't say "expelled from
> > > Scandinavia" (i.e. they could have moved to
> > another
> > > location in Scandinavia). This could in fact apply
> > to
> > > those Eruli who had recently settled in
> > Scandinavia
> > > after their trek north (cf. Procopius: the time
> > frame
> > > is shortly after 512 AD. The Danes are unknown
> > prior
> > > to the 6th century.) There has been extensive
> > > discussion of this issue on the Gothic and
> > Germanic
> > > lists.******
> > >
> > >
> > It is of course possible that the incident took
> > place on Madagascar
> > to where both peoples had emigrated, and from where,
> > after the Danes
> > had expule'd the Herulei they went their separate
> > ways.
>
> ******GK: Comments like that merely demonstrate for
> the umpteenth time the (shall we say diplomatically)
> oddity of your thinking. Try to be more responsible.
> You said "DRIVEN FROM SCANDINAVIA". Now to any normal
> reader of English this means that they left the area.
> But there is nothing in Jordanes which proves that the
> Eruli he speaks of were in fact pushed OUT of
> SCANDINAVIA. Both Dani and Eruli could have occupied
> particular areas IN Scandinavia and what happened was
> simply a reshuffle WITHIN Scandinavia. Many scenarios
> are possible. But I must repeat in the strongest
> possible terms. There is no way that Jordanes can be
> used to PROVE one's favourite solution here. Nor can
> he be used to disprove it. What is practically certain
> is that the clash occurred IN Scandinavia. But the
> Heruli's later fate cannot be determined from Jordanes
> alone. Jordanes is not PROBATIVE beyond the mere fact
> that both Dani and Heruli were in Scandinavia at some
> point in time.******
>
> But using
> > Occam, and with no evidence that the Dani migrated
> > anywhere after
> > this event, the safest bet is to assume that it
> > happened where the
> > Dani live now, ie. in Denmark.
> >
> > The problem is with the interpretation of <proprius>
> > "own".
> > Whose "own"? Did the Danes expel the Heruli from the
> > Heruli's own
> > settlements (thus being invaders or colonizers from
> > somewhere else,
> > eg. Sweden) or did the Danes (as I read in a
> > fanciful book by Viggo
> > Starcke) expel the Heruli from the Danes' own
> > settlements (the
> > Heruli, thus, should be assumed to have improperly
> > taken those from
> > the Danes some time before)?
> >
> > There is a third solution to the "own" problem.
> > Suppose both peoples
> > lived in the same settlements and that the Danes
> > drove them out for
> > some reason? The Heruli are known to have been both
> > a class (when in
> > Denmark) and a people (when in Europe). The
> > spectacle of a people
> > driving out a learned class or people would not be a
> > unique one in
> > history.
> >
> > I propose this scenario:
> >
> > 1) approx 50 BCE - 0
> >
> > Someone arrives from the south in Denmark and later
> > in the rest of
> > Scandinavia (Albrectsen's conclusion based on the
> > sudden introduction
> > of inhumation graves, see earlier postings).
> >
> > 2) approx 190 CE
> > The last "free Scandinavians" in western Norway
> > launch an attack on
> > the invaders but are repulsed (Illerup Aadal, approx
> > 15000 weapon-
> > related items sacrificed in bog (see
> > http://www.illerup.dk) and
> > related sites, this is no incursion, this is war)
> >
> > 3) approx 400 CE?
> > As the Roman empire is weakened, so are the Germanic
> > tribes that prey
> > on them. A new attack, and the original invaders
> > (now known as
> > Heruli) are expelled. In the general mayhem under
> > the occupation, all
> > tribes known before to Greek and Roman authors
> > (except possibly the
> > Cimbri) have disappeared and the people is now known
> > under the name
> > of another tribe of the original invaders: Dani.
> >
> > 4) approx 50-100 years later?
> > The Heruli return from Europe and are given free
> > passage through
> > Denmark to Sweden, where they settle.
> >
> > Dates subject to negotiation, of course!
> >
> > Torsten
> >

I place the "expulsion" before their exploits outside Scandinavia.
You seem to want to place it after that.

Yes, many scenarios are possible, and I have just presented another
one. I suppose that makes me about as odd as those who presented the
other scenarios.

Of course you can't prove anything from the Jordanes quote. Only
thing you can do is see to it that your scenario doesn't contradict
him. As for your remarks about responsibility, I understand that, but
what if this is what actually what happened?

I was wondering how this scenario would fit in with Tore's scenario
for the arrival of the Svear in Sweden?

I have taken into account a lot of facts from

http://www.geocities.com/troels_brandt/heruls.html

BTW The boar helmets Brandt mentions are said by Tacitus to be
charateristic of the Aestii. Hm!


Torsten