Re: [tied] Old Rus' of the many "nationes"

--- In cybalist@..., george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
> *****GK: Why not start the analysis from the earlier
> form: BORYSTHENES. Many linguists hold that this also
> is a river+river (BORYS+THENES) term, of which the 4th
> c. A.D. DANA+PRIS is merely a reshuffle.*****
>

"Not" because I have nothing to say on that form :)
I've just xeroxed the Vanagas' article I mentioned (plus some
relevent lexicographical sources), so I'll probably cook something on
Baltic *Dun- in some hours.

Sergei