From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 11200
Date: 2001-11-17
> --- In cybalist@..., "Alexander Stolbov" <astolbov@...> wrote:of
> > I don't think that the Kingdom of Vani could be a good candidate
> for Vanir.
> > The reasons why not are, IMHO:
> >
> > - Geography. The Vanaheim is situated on the Tanais banks (a
> neighbour
> > region of Asaheim), but not behind the Caucasus mountain far
> southward.
> >
> > - A town. The center of the Kingdom of Vani was the town of Vani
> but towns
> > of Vanir were never mentioned (in contrast with Asgaard) - only
> Vanaheim and
> > Vanaland.
> >
> > - Way of life. During the war "victory was changeable, and they
> ravaged the
> > lands of each other, and did great damage". If Aesir were semi-
> nomads, Vanir
> > had to be (semi)nomads too, otherwise the war would not have a
> character as
> > described and would not finished with mutual love. Actually one
> thepeople
> > tribes was incorporated in the structure of another one.
> >
> > If Aesir are not a fruit of imagination of ancient Scandinavians,
> but a real
> > tribe they must be Asses (= Yass = Yazig), a group of Alanian
> > (sometimes Asses were equated with Alans, sometimes werementioned
> side byplace,
> > side with them). Everything - name (letter by letter), time,
> manycrisis.
> > details fit well.
> >
>
> >
> >
> > Alexander
> >
>
> Some years ago there was what was known as the Asian economic
> It came suddenly, and it left again after some month or so. All thescience
> economic commentators were puzzled as to why.
>
> I have a guess what might have happened.
>
> First a digression.
>
> Suppose we were to write a object-oriented program to describe a
> community, or trade network, what types of objects would we need?
>
> We would need independent Agents, who had Transactions (perhaps in
> predetermined Places (Markets, Cities), moving along set Routes) in
> which they exchanged Stuff or Things. And to haggle and get the
> conditions for the transaction right (at least for transactions
> beyond rudimentary ad-hoc barter) they would need a Language. You
> might describe this system with large graph (in the computer
> sense of the word, or call it a network).Hongkong.
>
> But these networks would be isolated from one another, and there
> would be no trade among them, if there are no Bilinguals to connect
> them.
>
> So.
>
> The Asian trade which is part of the Asian network, is largely
> conducted by Chinese, in Chinese. For connection to the World, or
> English-speaking, economy it is dependent on bilinguals in
> Which at the time of the crisis was preparing to be given to China.the
> And a good part of the English-Chinese were therefore leaving at
> time. Before new bilinguals could take their place, trade would beBlack
> disrupted.
>
> And what has that got to do with anything?
>
> From Dio Chrysostomis' 36th Discourse, of Borysthenes, a Greek
> Sea colony at the mouth of the river Bug, in 96 CE:Crimea]...
>
> "
>
> ... And here it is also that we find the vast number of salt-works
> from which most of the barbarians buy their salt, as do also those
> Greeks and Scythians who occupy the Tauric Chersonese [the
>For
> The city of Borysthenes, as to its size. does not correspond to its
> ancient fame, because of its ever-repeated seizure and its wars.
> since the city has lain in the midst of barbarians now for so longa
> time - barbarians, too, who are virtually the most warlike of all -last
> it is always in a state of war and has often been captured, the
> and most disastrous capture occurring not more than one hundred andthe
> fifty years ago. And the Getae on that occasion seized not only
> Borysthenes but also the other cities along the left side of the
> Pontus as far as Apollonia [that would have been during the
> Mithridatic wars, perhaps "Odin" passing by? T.]. For that reason
> fortunes of the Greeks in that region reached a very low ebbindeed,
> some of them being no longer united to form cities, while otherscaptured
> enjoyed but a wretched existence as communities, and it was mostly
> barbarians who flocked to them. Indeed many cities have been
> in many parts of Greece, inasmuch as Greece is scattered in manyconsent
> regions. But after Borysthenes had been taken on the occasion
> mentioned, its people once more formed a community, with the
> of the Scythians, I imagine, because of the need for traffic withthe
> Greeks who might use this port. For the Greeks had stopped sailingto
> Borysthenes when the city was laid waste, inasmuch as they had nothemselves
> people of common speech to receive them, and the Scythians
> had neither the ambition nor the knowledge to equip a tradingcentre
> of their own after the Greek manner.port
> "
>
> Which was a rather long way of saying that you can't conclude from
> the existence of the port of Vani that the Vani themselves were
> sedentary. They might well have been semi-nomadic, coming to the
> only for trade. One wouldn't conclude from the existence of FortI had one more idea as to who the Vanir (Vani?) were.
> Apache that the Apache were sedentary? And perhaps the "land of the
> Vani" was as elusive as the "land of the Apache"?
>
> Torsten