From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 10234
Date: 2001-10-15
> >Rodulf,
> > --- In cybalist@..., tgpedersen@... wrote:
> >
> > > But this guy
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=cea20-
> > > ya02408000R2501990120540001%40nntp-serv.cam.ac.uk
> > >
> > > maintains that Hrólfr Kraki was actually a Herulian named
> > > that he appears in many guises in many sources, and that helived
> > inIs
> > > southeastern Europe. Geographically we're getting closer now.
> itbut
> > > possible after all to mesh in the Polish story into this web of
> > > stories?
> > >
> > > Torsten
>
> --- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> > He doesn't actually say so. He only speaks about the story of
> Rodulf
> > the Herulian having been absorbed into the Danish tradition and
> > applied to Hrólfr Kraki of Denmark. Kraki may mean 'thin pole',
> > not 'thin Pole'. Nevertheless, it's interesting to note that sucha
> > nickname (*krako:(n) is attested in Germanic. Maybe our legendarythe
> > Krak was a Vandalic leader (his daughter's name was Wanda).
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> The alternative explanation is that there was only one person and
> that his by-name was actually Kraki, which was only preserved in
> Danish (and Polish?) tradition. Saxo's explanation of the namesounds
> like one of those after-rationalisations most chroniclers come upI don't think either Wessén or Lukman let Hrólfr Kraki survive as an
> with when faced with an unfamiliar name (Oidipus = "stung-foot").
> But if he founded Krakow, he must have been a South Pole? (Please
> ignore this sentence).
>
> Torsten