Re: [tied] *H1wes-

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 7939
Date: 2001-07-18

I was just going to use this argument. No matter if PU *weti (R├ędei's reconstruction) is a very early loan or an "Indo-Uralic" word, it seems to rule out *h1-
 
Piotr
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Glen Gordon
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] *H1wes-

Ick! Of course, *wed- is seen even in Uralic *wete (viewed by
some as an early borrowing from IE) and there's no evidence of
any laryngeal there either.