From: John Croft
Message: 4517
Date: 2000-10-27
> Hey folks, it's me gLenNy gEe just saying that I'm still alive.Hooray! Hope
> you missed me. :) I neglected my email for a week and lived toregret it
> (some 600 messages in my email and not even spam!)needs to be
>
> I still can't get enough of this Goddess thing. I feel that it
> addressed fully in order to understand IE mythology. Afterall, IEmyth
> appears to have absorbed much of it.present at
>
> Now, Joao says:
> >There is similarities although I think this myth was not IE. The
>rescue of
> >a deity from Hell, whose ausence cause a decaying of nature >is
> >Balder myth (Scandinavia), Osiris & Isis (Egypt), Inana, >Dumuziand
> >Ereshkigal (Mesopotamia).Ereshkigal
>
> This is what is driving me bananas lately. It's the Inanna-Dumuzi-
> thing... and I agree that this is ultimately not an IE myth. "Whyis it
> driving me nuts," you ask? Well, it would appear that Inanna isassociated
> early on with the planet Venus. John can plead all he wants thatastral
> symbolisms derive from a culture in a "sunny climate" but itdoesn't make
> much sense in the end.Hag or
>
> Dumuzi seems to be the "sun" and Ereshkigal is certainly the Old
> White Death Goddess of European-Anatolian prehistorical mythrepresented
> astrally as the moon (and a perfect symbol to bring up just in timefor
> Halloween might I add since the moon is high and the pentagrams arebeing
> drawn as we speak).Sorry Glen, Dumuzi was the shepherd lord and fertility God, son of
> I gather so far that Dumuzi is the "beautiful young man" and simplya male
> version of the more common "beautiful young maiden" aspect of theGoddess,
> representing fertility, creation, youth, etc. This would make theplanet
> Venus a symbol of the intermediate aspect of Her - the mother. Themother
> can also be viewed as a symbol of fertility and especially _love_as in
> motherly love which is exactly the portrayal of her from the verystart of
> history.Inanna whilst associated with sex was not a mother. She was forever
>The Child
> Further, we might envision the planet Venus as "giving birth" to
> (aka: the sun). Images of mother with child exist from 6000 BCE inAnatolia.
> May I suggest that this imagery could have had an added astralsymbolism
> touching on the concept of "spring" as well as creation, fertility,etc.
> The so-called young (as well as older and bearded) Master of theAnimals
> that Gimbutas refers to all the time may therefore be viewed as agrowth on
> representation of the sun or the power of the sun to induce plant
> Mother Earth - thus a direct ancestor of Dumuzi. Because of thislast
> quality of our "Dumuzi", we might also consider the sun not only asa son of
> Venus but also a _consort_ of Her, fertilizing Mother Earth withHis rays
> (Can you say "Oedipus Complex"??!). Therefore the two males thatsometimes
> exist flanking the Goddess on either side may be one and the same,Glen, you have the Sumerian cosmology back to front. The sun did not
> representing The Sun and His Fertility both as Son and as Consort.
> So if I have all the answers, what's driving me nuts? Well, thequestion I
> started out with in my cutesy research and still haven't quiteanswered
> satisfactorily as of yet is: "Was the sun originally male or femalewhen the
> IEs came along to warp the myths with their own native concepts?"assexual
>
> Of course, we could say that the sun was neither male nor female,
> (animism), but all the symbolisms seen in prehistoric artifacts inEurope
> and Anatolia seem to be majoritarily gynofocal. So... I guess weshould
> think that the sun started out as "female" in Europe and viewed asa young
> Creatrix aspect of the Goddess. But... how does Dumuzi fit in thebig
> picture then?in
>
> My latest thinking is that maybe at around 7000 BCE or so, a shift
> Anatolia concerning the Goddess happened. The sun, being initiallya
> beautiful young maiden and daughter of Herself as the Preservatrix,came to
> be viewed as a _son_ instead.Sorry Glen, in Anatolia down tio classical times the sun was viewed
> assexual nature of children. The sex is particularly unimportantfor the
> Creatrix aspect since it is _youth_ and _creation_, neither ofwhich are
> sex-specific, which is the main concept here. This is opposed tothe greater
> importance of sex regarding the intermediate aspect, The Mother andbirth to
> Birth-Giving Goddess - fathers just can't lay Cosmic Eggs or give
> children no matter how hard they push :)Ghost",
>
> Gives a whole new meaning to "The Father, The Son, and The Holy
> doesn't it? Or should I say... "The Mother (Venus), The Child(Sun), and the
> Old Hag (Moon)".So Glen we have Venus was never portrayed as a mother, but as
> BTW, the rivalism between the Sun and the Moon (aka: Dumuzi andEreshkigal)
> is obvious since this is a metaphor for the change between Spring-Summer
> (young season dominated by day and sun) and Fall-Winter (old seasonGlen get your Sumerian seasons right. Fall winter to the Sumerians
> dominated by night and moon).
> Inanna the Mother here acts as mediator andHannahanna (Inanna's Hurrian predecessor) is mother to all the Gods.
> intermediate between Dumuzi and Ereshkigal.