From: Glen Gordon
Message: 2532
Date: 2000-05-24
>Now, however, linguist Johanna Nichols of the University of California,Ever get the feeling that people are copying you? Doesn't my linguistic map
>Berkeley, has used language to connect modern people of the Caucasus
> >region to the ancient farmers of the Fertile Crescent.
>she dated the ancestral language to about 8000 years ago.Sounds descent. Good ol' Nichols.
>Nichols also found that the ancestral language contains a host of >wordsHmm. I wonder how Semitic obtained the word *Tawru if it's an NEC word
>for farming. The Chechen words muq (barley), stu (bull), and >tkha (wool),
>for example, all have closely related forms in the >earliest branches of
>Daghestanian, as do words for pear, apple, dairy >product, and oxen
>yoke--all elements of the farming package developed >in the Fertile
>Crescent. Thus location, time, and vocabulary all >suggest that the farmers
>of the region were proto-Nakh-Daghestanians.
>Nichols is now reconstructing the ancestral language,Good, that language is a mess and Starostin's far-flung phonologies aren't
>Overall, Gensler found that about half the shared features areSounds like there are others like John who can't seperate language from
>rare elsewhere. "I think the case against coincidence is about as good >as
>it could be," he says.
>[...]
>Although others are interested in Gensler's idea, so far "there is no
>significant northwest African genetic signature ... in Celtic
> >populations,"
>But in this instance, he adds, the linguists may be ahead of theARRRRRGGHHHHHHH!!!!!! Are geneticists on drugs or are they just born that
>geneticists, for researchers need more genetic markers before they can
>confirm or refute Gensler's idea.