John: Error #4

>Thanks Tommy for your support in the debate between the "use a wide >set of
>evidence to discuss paleoethnography" (eg Alexander, myself >and now you)
>versus the position of Glen the pure linguist who >denies the relevant
>evidence from any other source of data than >linguistic in looking at the
>human origins de la parole.

Wrong. Re-read my posts. I clearly stated in one of them that I require
linguistic evidence FIRST followed by whatever data that is relevant whether
it be genetic or otherwise. Do you have any linguistic data yet, John? Have
you explained the direct correlation? No. This isn't politics, this is pure
reasoning.

- gLeN
______________________________________________________