Re: John: Error #4

Glen Gordon wrote:

>
> >Thanks Tommy for your support in the debate between the "use a wide >set of
> >evidence to discuss paleoethnography" (eg Alexander, myself >and now you)
> >versus the position of Glen the pure linguist who >denies the relevant
> >evidence from any other source of data than >linguistic in looking at the
> >human origins de la parole.
>
> Wrong. Re-read my posts. I clearly stated in one of them that I require
> linguistic evidence FIRST followed by whatever data that is relevant whether
> it be genetic or otherwise. Do you have any linguistic data yet, John? Have
> you explained the direct correlation? No. This isn't politics, this is pure
> reasoning.
>
> - gLeN
> __

Yes, Glen. And in your earlier post today you stated that anyone who
speaks a language can comment on linguistics. How do we draw the line
between someone who *knows* what he's talking about vs someone who's
*out to lunch*?
Gerry
____________________________________________________

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Body Paint, Chocolates, & Roses Oh My!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/1159/0/_/2431/_/949702521/
>
> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!
> -- http://www.egroups.com/cal?listname=cybalist&m=1

--

Gerald Reinhart
Independent Scholar
(650) 321-7378
waluk@...
http://www.alekseevmanuscript.com