Re: ?kooks?

Dear Adrian,

This list is about Indo European studies, isn't it? :-) . I myself I'm not a
scholar in linguistics (I'm quite good in semiotics and imagology). I'm not
sending messages to the list because I'm here in order to learn more about the
"master topics" of the list.

I also happen to be familiar to some "information theories" that include even
"New Age" points of view (such as Bohm's, of course). Therefore I would like to
take a look to the article below:

Beyond reality -- Watching information at play in the quantum world is throwing
physicists into a flat spin,
(by Mark Buchanan -- From New Scientist, 14 March 1998). You'll find the article
at:
http://www.newscientist.com/ns/980314/features1.html

I should also want to ask you not to elaborate further in the field of
"on-the-edge" physics on this list -- it (i.e. this list) has a completely
different coverage ?

Sincerely yours,
Mihai D. Popescu -- Romania

Adrian wrote:

> These "kooks", happen to be qualified scientists" Hope it is not too
> shocking.
>
> Adrian
>
> Apologies for the length of this letter but there is something I'd like to
> say about this particular topic of human levitation and other supernatural
> feats -having first experienced full-blown Kundalini enlightenment in 1993,
> which was my initiation into many so-called "paranormal" experiences
> thereafter:
> Mark Dunn and I are working on a theory of consciousness. This theory is
> based on our own experiences which are similar and which can explain such
> feats as telekinesis, levitation - also OBEs, NDE's, RV etc. Jhan Davis has
> recently joined us in this theory - as he has had similar experiences of his
> own and therefore similar insights.
>
> Many physicists have conditioned themselves to have their noses so deeply
> immersed within (...)
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Gary Osborn
>