From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 9063
Date: 2001-09-05
> I wonder if a case could be made for *bogU being an _Indo-Aryan_You seem to be on the Trubachev's side at last? :)
> loanword in Slavic (borrowed when there were still some Indo-Aryans
> north of the Black Sea).
> Inherited *bHagos should show WinterianAs I can conclude from this and some previous posts, you seem to be a
> lengthening (**bagU)
> *sUboz^Ije `corn,*dus-
> crop' looks like a collective (of what?) but might also be a
> deadjectival noun presupposing *sU-bogU < *su-bHaga- `prosperous,
> fortunate, blessed', perhaps the opposite of *ne-bogU (calquing
> bHaga-?) `unfortunate'. However, under this analysis *sU- < *su-can
> only be Indo-Aryan (or perhaps Proto-Indo-Iranian, but that mightbe
> too early to avoid Winter's Law in Baltic/Slavic), since theIranian
> reflex is *hu-. Compounds with (PIE) *h1su- and *dus- are almostparallels.
> absent from Slavic. The only examples I can think of are *dUzdjI <
> *dus-dju- `rain' (literally `bad day') and *sUdorvU < *su-dorwo-
> `healthy', both of which appear to have some Indo-Iranian