Re: tilde Re: Number of writing systems

El Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:55:05 -0400, "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...> escribió:

>Catalogued where? by whom?

In this forum, by the moderators.

>If you never suggested it, and I never suggested it, why are you arguing
>so vehemently?

It looks like another try to shift the question: "arguing so vehemently". Excuse my smile, Mr. Daniels, but a thing doesn't make real only because of asserting it. Calm down, Mr Daniels and, please, remember that this list of your chronological assertions...:

>1.- «The word "tilde" refers in English [...] the Spanish palatalization
>mark [...]»
>[...]
>7.- «It is a functional mark in the letter <ñ> [...] it does not mark
>palatalization. It marks off the palatal >phoneme as distinct from the
>alveoloar phoneme»

...is still awaiting for your kind assumption of the transformation of your thinking from what you asserted at first to what you asserted at last. Though actually it is not necessary, because we all know what means and implies this list of assertions of yours. It's only a request of honest courtesy.

Regards,
Agustin Barahona

P.S.: I don't know why Mr Daniels' messages are published with a date from two or -sometimes- more days ago. This morning I entered in our forum in Internet and there was no message after the last one of mines. So, Mr Daniels' message has been published today, a few moments ago.