From: Andrew Dunbar
Message: 6104
Date: 2005-09-26
> --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, Michael Eversonhave
> <everson@...> wrote:
> >
> > If you think about it you might suppose that it
> > must have been because someone thought that
> > regular rotations and superscription of base
> > characters was a regular way of indicating
> > relationships.
>
> By now every linguistics prof has their class notes
> on the internet and this is what they look like.
>
> "In some writing systems individual phonetic
> features do receive their own specific graphic
> representation, and both syllabaries and alphabets
> may have this featural quality to varying degrees
> (Japanese use of '' to denote voicing, Spanish tilda
> for nasalization.) The English alphabet does not
> any such featural markers. Korean Hangul shows thehttp://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ling201/test4materials/Writing1.htm
> most extensive example of featural representation
> and might be considered a featural system as well as
> an alphabet."
>
> Suzannehttp://en.wiktionary.org -- http://linguaphile.sf.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl
>
>
>