Michael Everson wrote:

>
> At 16:34 -0400 2005-09-17, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >All this (from Blissymbolics through Swahili) shows is that your
> >usage of the terminology is extremely different from linguists' use
> >of this terminology.
>
> I take some offence at your suggestion that I am not a linguist.

All I have to go on is the evidence posted here. You don't use
long-established linguistic terminology the way linguists do.

> >It's unfortunate that you (pl.) took the same words that had been
> >current in linguistics for a century or so and gave them different
> >interpretations.
>
> You might be more specific.

Each of the words in the previous posting(s) on whose interpretation you
differed.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...