At 16:34 -0400 2005-09-17, Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>All this (from Blissymbolics through Swahili) shows is that your
>usage of the terminology is extremely different from linguists' use
>of this terminology.

I take some offence at your suggestion that I am not a linguist.

>It's unfortunate that you (pl.) took the same words that had been
>current in linguistics for a century or so and gave them different

You might be more specific.
Michael Everson *