>All this (from Blissymbolics through Swahili) shows is that yourI take some offence at your suggestion that I am not a linguist.
>usage of the terminology is extremely different from linguists' use
>of this terminology.
>It's unfortunate that you (pl.) took the same words that had beenYou might be more specific.
>current in linguistics for a century or so and gave them different
>interpretations.