i18n@... wrote:

>
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >
> > Then you _are_ the one who questioned the phrase, and when you deny it,
> > you are lying.
> >
> > Everything you write here is available at the yahoo groups site.
>
> Good, then quote me on it. Post the url too :)

Here's the proof that it was "Barry" who didn't know what "work for
hire" means. Given the date of my posting (and I looked at every one of
mine since Tuesday to find it), anyone can easily visit the yahoo groups
page and find the full text of his posting:

> Subject: Re: adobe/o'reillly publishing?
> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:00:56 -0400
> From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...>
> Reply-To: qalam@yahoogroups.com
> To: qalam@yahoogroups.com
> References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14
>
>
> i18n@... wrote:
> >
> > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You don't have to read farther than p. iv to know for your very own
> > > self. It's a "work for hire."
> >
> > What is a work for hire? Each section is hired by you? The book itself
> > is hired by OUP?
>
> Sorry, you have some nebulous connection with publishing and you don't
> know the phrase "work for hire"?
>
> "Copyright © 1996 Oxford University Press."
>
> > I am certain that at the very least OUP will have a copyright in the
> > collection of papers.

--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...