From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 5735
Date: 2005-09-01
>Yes. Your immense obtuseness apparently makes you unable to understand
> At 09:02 -0400 2005-09-01, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> > > >WHY ARE YOU INCAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING. The "Latin" approach to typing
> >> >Vai is NOT a good (let alone ideal) solution -- because it would require
> >> >an entire different level of education to get syllabically-writing
> >> >people to grasp the concept of segmentation.
> >>
> >> You couldn't be more patronizing if you tried, I am sure.
> >
> >I'm beginning to think you really are stupid.
>
> All that obtuseness must get in the way of your seeing more
> correctly, then. You've done all you can not to read and understand
> the intent of anything I've said, or of the very nice restatement ofYet you keep calling him "stupid."
> that position which Marco presented. I suspect your agenda on this
> forum is not to discuss and to learn and celebrate, but just to
> pontificate. I don't really understand what the payoff you get for
> that is...
>
> >How many times do we have to tell you, it has nothing to do with "stupid."
>
> You said: "The "Latin" approach to typing Vai is NOT a good (let
> alone ideal) solution -- because it would require an entire different
> level of education to get syllabically-writing people to grasp the
> concept of segmentation."
>
> Well my goodness. For a Vai to be able to use my keyboard layout he
> would have to *learn* something new.
> And that something *isn't* alien to him. Because syllabary charts heWhat use is a syllabary chart keyed with roman letters to someone
> has seen for his script are arranged in terms of segmentation.
> Because his script has doublets and triplets all through it, like
> PEE/BHE which are similar in shape and rhyme but differ only by the
> initial consonant. Like KPEE/MGBEE/GBEE. Like CE/JE/NJE/YE. Like
> FU/VU. Like FO/VO.
> Indeed, a Vai would have to be pretty unobservant NOT to be able toNow you've switched from "stupid" to "unobservant." You would look a lot
> perceive the distinction that some glyphs represent sounds which are
> different in consonant but the same in vowel.
> >It has to do with some years of pre-preparation.A person WHO ALREADY READS AND WRITES ENGLISH (or Arabic, though you're
>
> A person can learn how to use a computer with no years of
> pre-preparation. A person can learn how to bake bread with no years
> of pre-preparation. Vai people are not cursed to be incapable of
> learning alphabetic input for their syllabic script.
> >Do they also want to have to learn to read and write English -- which isAnd it has now been revealed that the Vais you have met, who speak
> >a considerably different task from speaking Liberian English, even if
> >some fraction of them do so?
>
> A Vai person who does not learn some English will have a very tough
> time using a computer indeed. The Vais I have met, who want to use
> Vai on computers, speak English.
> > > And you are wrong about Vai people being incapable of learning how toExactly. I said "cannot ... without"; in the latest formulation I said
> >> segment syllables. Their syllabary charts are arranged with
> >> consonants on one axis and vowels on another. In real books given to
> > > real children.
> >
> >I did not say "incapable." I said that people who have not been
> >educated in an alphabetic literacy cannot segment syllables.
>
> "Cannot" is synonymous with "incapable". Though to be more precise,
> what you said is that syllable segmentation would be a new skill they
> would have to learn.
> And the skill isn't that new, because their script has built into itThere is no pattern built into the script. Don't you recall arguing
> a pattern which indicates a certain segmentation, and because their
> script is presented in syllabary charts. "Hm," says the learner,
> "I've forgotten how to write TA. Heres' the T- row, and I follow it
> over to the -A column....
> Wow, that's just like T + A = TA.I guess you just don't get it, and maybe never will. Does that make you
> >Once again, I am not going to waste my time downloading a 1 MbIt's clear that your document is a secondary collection of materials,
> >document -- let alone looking through it to find what information
> >you may or may not provide.
>
> If you were really interested in learning about the world's writing
> systems from others who have spent time and effort studying them and
> analyzing them, you might have deigned to have downloaded the
> document we have been discussing for the past month. As you have not
> done so, it is clear that you're not really interested in Vai, but
> rather in just picking a fight.
> >Is it too much trouble for you to copy and paste one paragraph? (If,No need; Richard showed us that the relevant paragraph does indeed not
> >in fact, it includes such information.)
>
> Frankly, I don't see much reason to reward your rudeness just now by
> doing you any favours.