--- Michael Everson <everson@...> wrote:

> At 08:58 -0400 2005-08-29, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >Now we're back to 20 days ago. "*Multiple* smaller
> >fonts" is an idiotic solution.
>
> Not if (1) one has an old Mac that can't do Unicode,
> (2) one has the luxury of time to strive for very
> good typography, or (3) one is using lead type,
> where they had boxes of fonts in the office.
>
> This is just a statement of principle, not a
> criticism aimed anywhere
> in particular.

Can't we just agree that there are at least two
perfectly good solutions to the problem and that each
person can choose which is best for them, and then
move on to more appropriate and interesting topics?

Andrew Dunbar

> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>

http://en.wiktionary.org -- http://linguaphile.sf.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com