From: Andrew Dunbar
Message: 5612
Date: 2005-08-30
> At 08:58 -0400 2005-08-29, Peter T. Daniels wrote:Can't we just agree that there are at least two
>
> >Now we're back to 20 days ago. "*Multiple* smaller
> >fonts" is an idiotic solution.
>
> Not if (1) one has an old Mac that can't do Unicode,
> (2) one has the luxury of time to strive for very
> good typography, or (3) one is using lead type,
> where they had boxes of fonts in the office.
>
> This is just a statement of principle, not a
> criticism aimed anywhere
> in particular.
> --http://en.wiktionary.org -- http://linguaphile.sf.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>