Re: Writing complex hanzi (CJK)

Nicholas Bodley <nbodley at speakeasy dot net> wrote:

> Now that I'm thinking of it, what happened in Vol. II of the Unicode
> 1.0 standard book? Fairly sure it was mostly CJK, and the few copies
> I saw were badly "over-inked".

Mine looks OK. I guess I got lucky.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/