From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 4778
Date: 2005-04-20
>Then why does Roger Woodard state that the "Fayum" [sic] plaques, which
> --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham"
> <richard.wordingham@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...>
> > wrote:
> > > Richard Wordingham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Peter T. Daniels wrote on Sunday, April 17, 2005 5:47 PM
>
> > > There's no f in Greek. Or even Etruscan. It's a Latin innovation. Waw >
> > > digamma. Upsilon is a later development -- is it in all the epichoric
> > > alphabets?
>
> > Digamma *is* the Greek 'f' - used for /w/ of course. I don't know
> > what *you* mean by 'epichoric'. I did a quick google, and found a
> > chart at http://luna.cas.usf.edu/~murray/classes/cg/alphabet.htm .
> > According to that all the epichoric alphabets with digamma (or 'vau'
> > if you prefer) had upsilon distinct from it.
>
> Moreover, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal confirms that all epichoric
> alphabets had upsilon -
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nostratic-L/message/2000 . Were you
> looking for a second opinion?
> The review by Peter T. Daniels for The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages has been published.--
>
> To view the review, please visit our website at the following url.
>
> http://www.bookreviews.org/BookDetail.asp?TitleId=4452
>
> TITLE: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages
> PUBLISHER: Cambridge University Press (2004)
>
> EDITOR: Roger D. Woodard