--- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Nicholas Bodley" <nbodley@...> wrote:

> >> Icelandic isn't one of the many languages they're designed to
> >> accommodate.
>
> Well, if you're using MacRoman encoding, no. But there must be

others that

> include Icelandic.

I use thorn and eth for Old English, Proto-Germanic and Latin-1
IPA. I don't think I've ever used them for Icelandic.

> I found many useful-looking "hits" when I Googled on [mac fonts
> icelandic]. Some, probably many, must be free.

> > Hungarian is, but I gather standard Windows fonts don't have

the

> > long-umlaut diacritic.

> Most likely, someone else has already replied. Unicode calls

them "double

> acute". Try U+0150 and 0151, U+0170, 0171. They are Ő, Å`, Å°, ű,

provided

> the utf-8 doesn't become corrupted along the way.

Works fine in the IE and Firefox browsers if one tells them that the
data is actually in UTF-8.

I'm not explictly e-mailing any of these replies. I'm using the
reply button in the archives. As there may actually be some who
don't know, the archives are at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qalam/messages . You don't have to
log in to view the archives, but you do have to log in to post a
reply via the web pages.

Unlike the rest of my recent posts, this reply is being made via
Internet Explorer.

Richard.