On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:52:26 +0000 (GMT), Andrew Dunbar
<
hippietrail@...> wrote:
Weird line breaks, just below! I didn't do them...
>> As I understand it, the font does not contain
>> instructions for such
>> matters as reordering, reshaping, and joining; those
>> are the
>> responsibility of the software that renders the
>> text. I do recall that
>> Unicode is clear about this matter.
>> How I wish Linux had something like Uniscribe!
> Linux does have something like Uniscribe. It's called
> Pango and it lives at http://www.pango.org/
> Sadly, it was quite a bit behind Uniscribe when I last
> looked.
> Andrew Dunbar.
Thank you. I just had a look, and it apparently supports Indic languages
better than the current Uniscribe; could be wrong about that. Some other
things about it looked very nice. Page was last modified in year 2000;
pity! Hope the developer is well and happy.
Uniscribe and Pango, once they are complete*, must represent a great deal
of work.
*I'm just about sure that neither is.
Suzanne McC. might like to have a look at the Tamil specimen on the Pango
page.
Best regards,
--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass.
The curious hermit -- autodidact and polymath
Libranet GNU/Linux: No bit rot!
Our recent election: Smallest margin since
Woodrow Wilson, 1916: Not a mandate.