From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 3459
Date: 2004-08-18
>Ecological Linguistics (Lloyd Anderson)'s fonts use two different kinds
> --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...>
> wrote:
> > suzmccarth wrote:
> > >
> > > (Dead keys IMO
> > > are very non-intuitive and should only be used for a very limited
> > > number of features in any script, if at all.)
>
> > I've had the impression that you're old enough to remember
> typewriters.
> > Didn't you ever have to put accents on letters? Don't you remember
> the
> > annoyance of backspacing?
>
> > For those of you who are younger than typewriters, a "dead key"
> was one
> > that didn't move the carriage but printed an accent above/below
> where
> > you were about to type a letter.
>
> I think Suzanne would welcome that sort of dead key on a computer.
> The dead keys I am familiar with - e.g. the dead keys in the United
> States Internation 'keyboard' in Windows - do nothing until the
> second character is typed. Can such 'keyboards' be modified to
> display something while waiting for the second key press?
>
> We have another case of conflicting terminology here. On a Thai
> (also Tamil?) keyboard, the keys for the superscript and subscript
> vowels are what Peter Daniels would call 'dead keys', but they are
> not 'dead keys' in the sense of computer keyboard technology!