Marco Cimarosti scripsit:
> Not necessarily: each glyph in the "visual store" could contain (a)
> pointer(s) to the character(s) in the "back store" to which it maps.
That just boils down to memoizing the function. You could do the same
in a visual-order input system, where the back store points to the
visual store instead.
--
A poetical purist named Cowan [that's me:
jcowan@...]
Once put the rest of us dowan. [on xml-dev]
"Your verse would be sweeter
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
If it only had metre
http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan." [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay