Re: Unicode definitions of script types

Michael Everson wrote:

>
> At 21:31 -0400 2004-07-11, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >(a) We've been told that nothing will be changed no matter what anyone says;
>
> That isn't true.
>
> >(b) I am not "correcting" it here; I am pointing out that my intentions
> >were, at the least, distorted.
>
> Prove it, please. Compare the texts and show us the distortion.

You keep saying that. Are you illiterate? Can you not read?

As long as the perpetrators of the distortion remain concealed in the
bureaucracy that is Unicode, what's the point?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...